The table below is of the Dow Jones going back to 1950 and is divided into three columns with an initial investment of $10,000: The column on the right shows how the $10,000 grew over time via just simple buy and hold, while the other two columns split this $10,000 investment into two 6 month time frames of the year. The left hand column shows what would happen if you invested $10,000 in the Dow Jones from 1950 to present ONLY during the May1 - Oct 31 six month time frame every year, while the middle column shows the results if you invested the $10,000 into the Dow Jones in the other 6 months of the year every year from Nov 1 - April 30th.
The results are quite astonishing: If one invested $10,000 into the Dow Jones ONLY from May 1st - Oct 31st and starting from 1950 to present, you actually LOST money over 62 years, & just went positive in 2012!! Now putting this into contrast, if you had invested the $10,000 into the other 6 month time frame (Nov 1 - Apr 30th), that $10,000 turned into $935K! Quite a difference. Lastly, if you simply invested your money into the Dow Jones from 1950 - present using buy & hold, your $10,000 grew into $726K (minus dividends of course), which is less than if you had your money invested in the Dow from Nov 1 - Apr 30th on 6 months of the year!
What this table and statistics show you is that historically the market has made the majority of its gains in one 6 month time frame of the year (Nov 1 - April 30th). Market seasonality is real & the data backs it up.
|
$10000 starting investment for each 6 month time frame
|
|||||||
|
|
May1-Oct31
|
Nov1-Apr 30
|
Simple Buy & Hold
|
||||
|
Year
|
%gain/loss
|
$10,000
|
%gain/loss
|
$10,000
|
%gain/loss
|
$10,000
|
|
|
1950
|
5
|
$10,500
|
15.2
|
$11,520
|
17.6
|
$11,760
|
|
|
1951
|
1.2
|
$10,626
|
-1.8
|
$11,131
|
14.4
|
$13,453
|
|
|
1952
|
4.5
|
$11,104
|
2.1
|
$11,550
|
8.4
|
$14,584
|
|
|
1953
|
0.4
|
$11,149
|
15.8
|
$13,375
|
-3.8
|
$14,029
|
|
|
1954
|
10.3
|
$12,297
|
20.9
|
$16,171
|
44
|
$20,202
|
|
|
1955
|
6.9
|
$13,145
|
13.5
|
$18,354
|
20.8
|
$24,404
|
|
|
1956
|
-7.0
|
$12,225
|
3
|
$18,904
|
2.3
|
$24,966
|
|
|
1957
|
-10.8
|
$10,905
|
3.4
|
$19,547
|
-12.8
|
$21,770
|
|
|
1958
|
19.2
|
$12,999
|
14.8
|
$22,440
|
34
|
$29,172
|
|
|
1959
|
3.7
|
$13,480
|
-6.9
|
$20,892
|
16.4
|
$33,956
|
|
|
1960
|
-3.5
|
$13,008
|
16.9
|
$24,422
|
-9.3
|
$30,798
|
|
|
1961
|
3.7
|
$13,489
|
-5.5
|
$23,079
|
18.7
|
$36,557
|
|
|
1962
|
-11.4
|
$11,951
|
21.7
|
$28,087
|
-10.8
|
$32,609
|
|
|
1963
|
5.2
|
$12,573
|
7.4
|
$30,166
|
17
|
$38,153
|
|
|
1964
|
7.7
|
$13,541
|
5.6
|
$31,855
|
14.6
|
$43,723
|
|
|
1965
|
4.2
|
$14,110
|
-2.8
|
$30,963
|
10.9
|
$48,489
|
|
|
1966
|
-13.6
|
$12,191
|
11.1
|
$34,400
|
-18.9
|
$39,324
|
|
|
1967
|
-1.9
|
$11,959
|
3.7
|
$35,673
|
15.2
|
$45,302
|
|
|
1968
|
4.4
|
$12,485
|
-0.2
|
$35,601
|
4.3
|
$47,250
|
|
|
1969
|
-9.9
|
$11,249
|
-14
|
$30,617
|
-15.2
|
$40,068
|
|
|
1970
|
2.7
|
$11,553
|
24.6
|
$38,149
|
4.8
|
$41,991
|
|
|
1971
|
-10.9
|
$10,294
|
13.7
|
$43,375
|
6.1
|
$44,552
|
|
|
1972
|
0.1
|
$10,304
|
-3.6
|
$41,814
|
14.6
|
$51,057
|
|
|
1973
|
3.8
|
$10,696
|
-12.5
|
$36,587
|
-16.6
|
$42,582
|
|
|
1974
|
-20.5
|
$8,503
|
23.4
|
$45,148
|
-27.6
|
$30,829
|
|
|
1975
|
1.8
|
$8,656
|
19.2
|
$53,817
|
38.3
|
$42,637
|
|
|
1976
|
-3.2
|
$8,379
|
-3.9
|
$51,718
|
17.9
|
$50,269
|
|
|
1977
|
-11.7
|
$7,399
|
2.3
|
$52,907
|
-17.3
|
$41,572
|
|
|
1978
|
-5.4
|
$6,999
|
7.9
|
$57,087
|
-3.1
|
$40,283
|
|
|
1979
|
-4.6
|
$6,677
|
0.2
|
$57,201
|
4.2
|
$41,975
|
|
|
1980
|
13.1
|
$7,552
|
7.9
|
$61,720
|
14.9
|
$48,230
|
|
|
1981
|
-14.6
|
$6,449
|
-0.5
|
$61,412
|
-9.2
|
$43,793
|
|
|
1982
|
16.9
|
$7,539
|
23.6
|
$75,905
|
19.6
|
$52,376
|
|
|
1983
|
-0.1
|
$7,532
|
-4.4
|
$72,565
|
20.3
|
$63,008
|
|
|
1984
|
3.1
|
$7,765
|
4.2
|
$75,613
|
-3.7
|
$60,677
|
|
|
1985
|
9.2
|
$8,480
|
29.8
|
$98,145
|
27.7
|
$77,484
|
|
|
1986
|
5.3
|
$8,929
|
21.8
|
$119,541
|
22.6
|
$94,996
|
|
|
1987
|
-12.8
|
$7,786
|
1.9
|
$121,812
|
2.3
|
$97,181
|
|
|
1988
|
5.7
|
$8,230
|
12.6
|
$137,161
|
11.8
|
$108,648
|
|
|
1989
|
9.4
|
$9,004
|
0.4
|
$137,709
|
27
|
$137,983
|
|
|
1990
|
-8.1
|
$8,274
|
18.2
|
$162,772
|
-4.3
|
$132,050
|
|
|
1991
|
6.3
|
$8,796
|
9.4
|
$178,073
|
20.3
|
$158,856
|
|
|
1992
|
-4.0
|
$8,444
|
6.2
|
$189,113
|
4.2
|
$165,528
|
|
|
1993
|
7.4
|
$9,069
|
0
|
$189,170
|
13.7
|
$188,205
|
|
|
1994
|
6.2
|
$9,631
|
10.6
|
$209,222
|
2.1
|
$192,157
|
|
|
1995
|
10.0
|
$10,594
|
17.1
|
$244,999
|
33.5
|
$256,530
|
|
|
1996
|
8.3
|
$11,473
|
16.2
|
$346,751
|
26
|
$323,228
|
|
|
1997
|
6.2
|
$12,184
|
21.8
|
$346,751
|
22.6
|
$396,278
|
|
|
1998
|
-5.2
|
$11,551
|
25.6
|
$435,520
|
16.1
|
$460,078
|
|
|
1999
|
-0.5
|
$11,493
|
0
|
$435,694
|
25.2
|
$576,018
|
|
|
2000
|
2.2
|
$11,746
|
-2.2
|
$426,109
|
-6.2
|
$540,305
|
|
|
2001
|
-15.5
|
$9,925
|
9.6
|
$467,015
|
-7.1
|
$501,943
|
|
|
2002
|
-15.6
|
$8,377
|
1
|
$471,685
|
-16.8
|
$417,617
|
|
|
2003
|
15.6
|
$9,684
|
4.3
|
$491,968
|
25.3
|
$523,274
|
|
|
2004
|
-1.9
|
$9,500
|
1.6
|
$499,839
|
3.1
|
$539,495
|
|
|
2005
|
2.4
|
$9,728
|
8.9
|
$544,325
|
-0.6
|
$536,258
|
|
|
2006
|
6.3
|
$10,341
|
8.9
|
$592,770
|
16.3
|
$623,669
|
|
|
2007
|
6.6
|
$11,027
|
-7.9
|
$545,770
|
6.5
|
$663,977
|
|
|
2008
|
-27.3
|
$8,022
|
-12.4
|
$478,002
|
-33.8
|
$439,406
|
|
|
2009
|
18.9
|
$9,540
|
13.3
|
$541,811
|
18.9
|
$522,343
|
|
|
2010
|
1.0
|
$9,634
|
15.2
|
$624,164
|
11
|
$579,773
|
|
|
2011
|
-0.3
|
$9,605
|
15.1
|
$718,600
|
5.5
|
$611,851
|
|
|
2012
|
1.6
|
$9,759
|
13.9
|
$818,518
|
10.4
|
$675,700
|
|
|
2013
|
4.6
|
$10,208
|
7.6
|
$880,443
|
7.5
|
$726,543
|
|
|
2014
|
1.9
|
$10,402
|
6.2
|
$935,030
|
|||
|
64 Year loss/gain
|
$402
|
$935,030
|
$726,543
|
||||
To dig a little deeper, let’s take a look at major market tops & bottoms in the S&P 500 since 1950, and see if in fact the market seasonality effects hold true, & just how big & bad is the month of October?
Major Market Tops & Bottoms in the S&P since 1950 (Drawdowns of 20% or more for the bottoms):
Its interesting to note that October has by far the most major market bottoms, 5 of 10 in the chart above. But for market tops, October only has one since 1950, the high back in 2007 before the financial crisis.
As far as monthly historical performance, here is a chart of monthly returns since 1950, it tells quite a different story.
Very interesting that for October
to be the month of doom, its actually in the middle of the pack as far
historical returns, while September is clearly the actually month of doom. As
our study of the S&P confirms, you’ll see the monthly returns from
Nov-April are far superior to that of May-Oct.
One
last thing to consider is volatility. This is where October’s reputation
actually comes from, as its hands down the most volatile month historically
(measured by percent change from intra-month lows to intra-month highs). So
there you have it, now don’t let me catch you talking bad about October!